Vicious Dog Ordinance Being Considered By City
Mar 17, 2012 | 22441 views | 1 1 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print

By Wayne Allen

Common Staff Writer

The Portsmouth city health department submitted a second draft of vicious dog ordinance to be considered by council.

The department had submitted an earlier ordinance that if enacted would have deemed all pit bulls and wolf-hybrids vicious animals.

“A lot of people thought that (deeming all pit bulls and vicious animals) was unfair. There are some pit bulls that have no vicious bones in their body,” said Andy Gedeon, director of Environmental Health at the Portsmouth City Health Department.

“In this ordinance we made a compromise with members of city council. We worked extensively with them and what their constituents wanted to see in such an ordinance. The result was presented to council on Monday night.”

The proposed ordnance was presented on the Mayor’s conference agenda. After some debate council decided to allow the proposal to move forward. The proposed ordinance will be fully considered over the next three meetings allowing for three readings.

The ordinance defines “Vicious dogs” as having a habit of biting at children or other people or that has a propensity, tendency or disposition to attack, cause injury or otherwise endanger the safety of people or other animals.”

If the owner does not comply with the stipulations of the ordinance they’re subject to a misdemeanor charge, the severity of which depends on the number of violations the owner incurs.

“The vicious dog ordinance is a good thing because it will protect the public health. I’ve been doing this for 11 years in two different counties. In my professional experience a majority of the dog bites are pit bulls,” Gedeon said. “We are not picking on pit bulls with this ordinance; it is more of an overall vicious dog ordinance.”

Wendy Payton, animal control officer with the Portsmouth City Health Department, said the city had 161 complaints in 2011. She said 68 of those were pit bulls, or about 42 percent.



Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
jupiter5
|
March 21, 2012
The ordinance does, in fact, "pick on pit bulls." The current draft of the ordinance singles out owners of "pit bull"-looking dogs for special ownership rules that other dog owners do not have to abide by.

Whether you have to follow the special ownership rules depends solely on whether your dog resembles what a dog warden thinks a "pit bull type" might look like. It doesn't matter if you're a responsible dog owner. It doesn't matter if your dog is well-trained and always supervised or contained. It only matters whether your dog has or does not have a particular "look" to it, based on the opinion of a government employee who, in studies, only gets breed identification correct in fewer than 3 out of 10 tries.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

Gas Prices
Sponsored By:

Featured Businesses
Recipes
Sponsored By: